PRINCE Harry was “frustrated and saddened” after an article claimed he snubbed the Royal Marines when he stepped down as a senior royal, his lawyers said.
The Duke’s ability to help veterans and serving military by attracting public support were “seriously” hampered by allegations in the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline, according to the legal papers lodged with the High Court.
The article claimed Prince Harry hadn’t been in touch with his military connections and ducked out of his last appearance as an honorary Marine[/caption]
Associated Newspapers apologised to the Prince and made a donation to his foundation the Invictus Games[/caption]
After the articles appeared in October, Harry began legal proceedings before Christmas against Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Mail on Sunday and MailOnline.
The Mail on Sunday has since issued an apology to Prince Harry and made a donation to the Invictus Games fund.
The Mail on Sunday article, published on October 25, claimed that “informed sources say the prince has not been in touch by phone, letter nor email since his last appearance as an honorary Marine in March, prompting exasperated top brass to start considering a replacement”.
It also alleged the duke had not responded to a personal letter from Lord Dannatt, a former head of the British Army.
The article quoted a retired senior officer who called on Harry to “take the job seriously”.
The duke’s legal team said in the court papers that he had been “personally affronted” by the articles which had “caused huge damage to his reputation by reason of the publication of the words complained of”.
In the court document Harry’s legal team sets out his case and claims he was defamed by the articles and is claiming damages, but it was lodged before the Mail on Sunday printed an apology on December 27 and said it had made a donation to the foundation managing the duke’s Invictus Games.
It is understood his legal team will make an application to deliver a statement in open court which is expected to bring the matter to a close.
When Harry, who served as an Army officer for 10 years, and wife Meghan stood down as working royals and moved to America, his honorary military titles, including the prestigious post of Captain General of the Royal Marines, were put on hold.
He is not allowed to take any particular role using the titles at present, but they have not yet been handed to other members of the royal family.
They will be examined in March as part of the monarchy’s 12-month review of the Sussexes’ departure arrangements.
We apologise to Prince Harry and have made a donation to the Invictus Games Foundation.
Mail On Sunday
The Queen’s grandson was also “frustrated and saddened” as the articles would diminish his credibility with veterans and serving military with mental health issues “and therefore make them less likely to seek the help being offered”.
The Mail on Sunday printed an apology on December 27 in its corrections and clarifications section, accepting the duke had been in touch with the Royal Marines.
It said: “Harry has been in contact in a private capacity with individuals in the military including in the Royal Marines to offer informal support since March and that whilst he did not initially receive the letter from Lord Dannatt referred to in the article due to administrative issues he has since replied on becoming aware of it.
“We apologise to Prince Harry and have made a donation to the Invictus Games Foundation.”
This isn’t the first time Prince Harry has battled with the newspaper as in 2019 he announced that Meghan Markle was suing the publication.
In a lengthy statement published on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s website, Harry alleged the paper had “unlawfully” published a letter from her to her father Thomas Markle.
Later this month, lawyers representing the Duchess of Sussex are set to argue their case in her privacy battle against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.
They are expected to call for a summary judgment which, if agreed, will stop any trial taking place at the High Court, reports The Sunday Times.
According to the paper, they will claim witnesses do not need to give evidence to show her privacy rights were breached when the Mail on Sunday published parts of a letter she wrote to her dad Thomas.
In the extracts, she complained about his behaviour before and after she married Prince Harry in Windsor in 2018.
Most read in News
Huge 11ft orca 'killer whale' rescued after getting stranded on UK beach
FIRED FOR FLING
Married Army general resigns over affair with female captain he commanded
LOCK & LAW
Lockdown 3 voted through Parliament – as MPs demand laws lifted after 13m jabbed
Staggering pics show size of mum's baby bump with son compared to with triplets
Horrific moment killer stabs three men to death while screaming 'Allahu Akbar'
Mom horrified after spotting creepy ghoul face in son's stroller in snap
The case will then be closed if Mr Justice Warby accepts her lawyer’s request for a summary judgment.
However, if he doesn’t, then the drama will continue and Harry could end up meeting his father-in-law, 76, for the first time – in a courtroom.
The prospect of a trial has sent shockwaves throughout as palace royal aides may be expected to give evidence.